Monday, June 29, 2015

SHOULD CHRISTIAN FAST TODAY ? WHAT FOR MUSLIMS FASTING ?

SHOULD CHRISTIAN FAST TODAY ? WHAT FOR MUSLIMS FASTING ?

TALKING ABOUT THE MONTH OF RAMADAN, MUSLIMS FASTING TO GET THE REWARDS FROM ALLAH AND MAKE THEM LOOK GOOD . IS THAT THE ASSURANCE FOR THEM TO GO TO HEAVEN ? THEY KNOW THEY DON'T HAVE THE ASSURANCE FROM ALLAH.
BESIDES THEY LIKE TO SHOW OFF THEMSELVES FOR BEING GOOD MUSLIMS AND MUST FOLLOW THE ORDER, FASTING DURING RAMADAN FROM DAWN - BEFORE SUNRISE TO SUNSET, NOT TO EAT AND NOT TO DRINK AT ALL DURING AT THAT TIME , THE LONGEST UNTIL 20 HOURS PER-DAY , PRAY VERY LOUD EVEN WITH LOUD SPEAKER IN THEIR MOSQUES AND LET EVERYBODY KNOW.

WHAT MUSLIMS DOING TO SHOW OFF THEIR FASTING, THEY AGAINST THE BIBLE ALREADY.

Matt 6:5-6, 16-18, KJV
5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for THEY LOVE TO PRAY STANDING IN THE SYNAGOGUES AND IN THE CORNERS OF THE STREETS, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. (**IN FACT MUSLIMS PRAYERS ARE WORSE THAN PHARISEES , PHARISEES DID NOT USE LOUD SPEAKER, LOL OF COURSE DURING JESUS DAYS THE LOUD SPEAKER WAS NOT INVENTED YET, HAHAHA, BESIDES MUSLIMS PRAY TO THE FALSE GOD, ALLAH, !)
6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
16 Moreover when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
17 But thou, WHEN THOU FASTEST, anoint thine head, and wash thy face;
18 That thou appear not unto men to FAST, but unto thy Father which is in secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly.

THE FACT IS THE WORD OF GOD IN THE BIBLE NEVER TEACH CHRISTIANS MUST FASTING FROM FOOD, YES FASTING FROM WORLDLY LIFE , AVOID DAILY FLESH (MUST WALKING IN THE SPIRIT OF GOD) AND REPENT FROM SINS (FASTING FROM SINS) . IF CHRISTIAN WANT TO FAST FROM FOOD, THAT'S OKAY BUT NOT FOR THE SALVATION ISSUE OR THE OBLIGATION !
It has no inherent spiritual value and cannot guarantee that a person draws closer to Christ. While fasting can be beneficial, it is good to remember Jesus’ words, “What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them” (Matthew 15:11).

WHAT MAKE CHRISTIANS ARE CLOSER TO CHRIST, SEEK HIM DILIGENTLY, HE WILL CLOSE TO YOU, IN ORDER EVEN CLOSER REPENT, NOT TO SIN AND BEING HOLY....HMMMM FASTING FROM FOOD , HELLLO. BUT NOT FASTING FROM SINS ? WHAT FOR !


Most believe the Fasting Bible verses act of fasting merely means not to consume food and/or drink for a set period of time. But the Fasting Bible verses act and Fasting Bible verses purpose means so much more than that. The Fasting Bible verses act is a sacrifice of sorts. Fasting Bible verses act according to the whole bible is to deny the flesh of that which it craves as to gain control over your flesh as to show that you belong to God and answer only to Him and not the calls of the flesh. The Fasting Bible verses act makes you more spiritually in tune with God.
Is the act of fasting something that is still to be practiced among Christians? What exactly is fasting? Is fasting something that is only done at certain times? This study on fasting will answer these questions and we’ll take a look at how fasting can become a part of your spiritual growth as you sojourn down the Christian walk.
Fasting is a way of humbling your soul.
Psalms 35:13
I humbled my soul with fasting ...

Let us look into the Bible on fasting ...
FASTING BIBLE STUDY
FASTING BIBLE STUDY LESSON ON FASTING BIBLE STUDY VERSES WITH FASTING BIBLE STUDY MESSAGE
WHY FAST?
Eating is a way to nourish your flesh.
Fasting is a way to nourish your soul.
By eating, your body gains strength to carry out the tasks that you need to do. Your soul however is different than the flesh. How do you gain strength for your soul? We all want to be strong in the Lord, as to allow HIS strength to work through us, we have to humble ourselves. We have to CHOOSE to surrender our desires as to allow HIS will to work through us. One way to do that is by fasting. By depriving the flesh of what it craves, it brings you into a closer spiritual connection and dependence on God.
Fasting is a choice. There are no requirements in the New Testament to fast. If you have health issues of any kind, you should abstain from physical cravings other than food that will humble your soul and bring you closer to God.
Isaiah 58:6-8
Is not this the fast that I have chosen? To loose the bands of wickedness, to undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every yoke? Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry, and that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house? when thou seest the naked, that thou cover him; and that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh? Then shall thy light break forth as the morning, and thine health shall spring forth speedily: and thy righteousness shall go before thee; the glory of the LORD shall be thy reward.

So we see that fasting from food is NOT the entire concept of fasting but rather to surrender YOUR physical desires and to serve HIS will is also a form of fasting.
Remember, fasting is not a ritual or a punishment, but a CHOICE. It is a way of bringing you close to your Father. It does not have to be food that you surrender, but rather ... Anything the flesh craves where we are consciously controlling the demands of the flesh. So, it is a type of sacrifice. It’s a positive experience, surrendering your soul to God, giving up your will, and replacing it with HIS.
FASTING BIBLE TRUTH IS THAT FASTING BIBLE CONCEPT IS TO GET CLOSER TO GOD BY SACRIFICE OF WORLDLY MEANS.

MORE TO STUDY : http://www.christianityoasis.com/Keyword/Fasting.htm


I FAST REGULARLY TO THE LORD, ABSTAIN FROM WORLDLY STUFFS AND WICKED THINGS IN THE WORLD AND FOCUS ON JESUS CHRIST NOT ON FOOD, THAT'S WHY GOD ANSWERED MY PRAYERS.
AND GOD SPEAKS TO ME REGULARLY IN MY SPIRIT EVEN HE SPOKE TOME IN AUDIBLE VOICES WITHOUT
ME FASTING FROM FOOD BUT FASTING FROM MY OWN FLESH. AND I CAN CAST OUT THE DEMON, ONE TIME THE BIG HUGE TALL BLACK ROBE DEMON APPEARED BEHIND ME, WHY HE WAS DISAPPEARED BEFORE I REBUKED HIM IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST, HMMM HE KNEW I CAN CAST OUT HIM IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST AND I HAVE A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD. HE WAS AFRAID OF ME.


SO HOW ABOUT CATHOLIC'S FASTING ?

According to catechism of the Roman Catholic Church, the Lenten fast is 40 days to represent the 40 days Jesus Christ spent fasting in the desert after he was baptized by John the Baptist. While Lent is 40 days long, there can be as many as 46 days between Ash Wednesday and Easter, depending on the year. Catholics not being allowed to eat meat on Fridays during Lent.

It has no inherent spiritual value and cannot guarantee that a person draws closer to Christ. While fasting can be beneficial, it is good to remember Jesus’ words, “What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them” (Matthew 15:11).


Why can’t Catholics eat meat on Fridays during Lent?"

Answer: Catholics practice various acts of penitence and spiritual self-discipline during Lent, the (approximately) forty days leading up to Easter. One of those disciplines is a fast that requires
Catholics to abstain from meat on Fridays during Lent. The rule is based on the authority of the Church, not on the authority of Scripture.

The rule that Catholics cannot eat meat on Fridays during Lent is actually more lenient than what most Catholics in history have had to observe. Centuries ago, the Catholic Church had a law that forbade consuming meat on all Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays. Later, this rule was relaxed to remove meat from the diet on Ash Wednesday and all Fridays. In 1966, Catholic bishops in America, with the blessing of Pope Paul VI, further relaxed the rule. Nowadays meat is only prohibited on Ash Wednesday, Good Friday, and Fridays of the Lenten season. Catholics are obligated to observe this fast as a minimum; they can make up stricter requirements for themselves, if they so desire.

The stated reason for Catholics not being allowed to eat meat on Fridays during Lent is to remind the faithful that Jesus died on a Friday. Jesus gave up His body (His flesh), and Catholics, in an effort to attain greater communion with Christ, refrain from consuming flesh.

If there is no eating meat on Fridays, then why is eating fish allowed for Catholics? The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops states that fish are a different category of animal. So it’s only the meat of warm-blooded animals that is prohibited. Eggs, butter, and milk are also allowed.

There is nothing in the Bible that remotely suggests that Christians must follow a predetermined fast. Eating meat on Fridays or not eating meat on Fridays—or any other day—is not an intrinsically spiritual issue. Abstaining from meat during Lent is simply a man-made ritual of the Catholic Church. It has no inherent spiritual value and cannot guarantee that a person draws closer to Christ. While fasting can be beneficial, it is good to remember Jesus’ words, “What goes into someone's mouth does not defile them” (Matthew 15:11)


Read more :
http://www.gotquestions.org/meat-on-Fridays.html#ixzz3eUQkDo9w 


   

Thursday, June 11, 2015

MY DREAM OF THE FALSE CHURCH-CATHOLIC CHURCH AND EXPOSE HER.

MY DREAM OF THE FALSE CHURCH-CATHOLIC CHURCH AND EXPOSE HER.

CATHOLIC CHURCH CLAIM , SHE IS THE TRUE- FIRST CHURCH AND WITHOUT CATHOLIC CHURCH, THERE IS NO OTHER CHRISTIAN DENOMINATIONS, IS THAT TRUE ?

LET ME GET THE FACT , FROM THE WORD OF GOD, NOT PEOPLE'S OPINION !

 

TALKING ABOUT CATHOLIC CHURCH IS THE FALSE CHURCH-THE BABYLONIAN CHURCH. GOD REVEALED IT TO ME, 5 YEARS AGO I SAW IN MY DREAM A LARGE HUGE CATHOLIC CHURCH-CATHEDRAL CHURCH, BUT THE CHURCH IS SO SO EVIL FROM LOOKING AT THAT BUILDING WITH GRAYISH COLOUR AND THE ARCHITECTURAL LOOKED LIKE BONEY OR FULL OF BONES , IT WAS VERY DEMONIC ! AND ALSO A YEAR LATER I SAW IN MY DREAM POPE BENEDICT WHO WAS THE POPE AT THAT TIME, WITH THE RED LETTERS 666 ABOVE HIS HEAD !
NOW FOR CATHOLICS, YOU WANT TO FOLLOW JESUS CHRIST AND HIS WORD OR YOUR CHURCH ? IF YOU KEEP FOLLOWING YOUR CHURCH, YOU'LL BE DECEIVED EVEN MORE AS WE ARE LIVING IN THESE LAST DAYS, ONCE YOU ARE LEFT BEHIND FROM THE RAPTURE BECAUSE YOUR FALSE BELIEF, YOU 'LL BE MORE LIKELY DECEIVED BY THE FALSE PROPHET REV 13-POPE FRANCIS AND THE ANTICHRIST EASILY ! TAKE HEED ! WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, THAT'S THE FACT, AS GOD REVEALED IT TO ME IN THE DREAMS AND WORDS.

CATHOLIC CHURCH CLAIM , SHE IS THE TRUE- FIRST CHURCH AND WITHOUT CATHOLIC CHURCH, THERE IS NO OTHER CHRISTIAN DENOMINATIONS, IS THAT TRUE ?
LET ME GET THE FACT , FROM THE WORD OF GOD, NOT PEOPLE'S OPINION !
The first christian church was IN THE ANTIOCH, THE NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH IN THE BIBLE, NOT CATHOLIC CHURCH.


ACTS 11:26, KJV
And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves WITH THE CHURCH, and taught much people. And the disciples WERE CALLED CHRISTIANS FIRST IN ANTIOCH. ((** NOT CATHOLIC, CATHOLIC IS NOT CHRISTIAN , IT MEANS UNIVERSAL, CHRISTIANS MEANS JESUS CHRIST'S FOLLOWER )).

THE NAME OF THE CHURCH IS THE CHURCH OF GOD, NOT MAN MADE CHURCHES LIKE CATHOLIC CHURCH ETC !!!

🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌💥
1 COR 1:2, KJV
Unto THE CHURCH OF GOD which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours.

SO HI CATHOLICS, PROVE IT , THERE IS CATHOLIC WORD IN THE BIBLE ?
NO WHERE YOU CAN FIND THERE , OKAY ?

YOU JUST SPREAD THE LIES LIKE MUSLIMS TO SUPPORT THEIR FALSE RELIGION ISLAM , AS YOURSELF IS FOLLOWING THE  FALSE CHURCH, CATHOLICS, GET YOUR LAZY MIND OUT AND READ THE WORD OF GOD WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT TEACHES YOU INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING YOUR FALSE CHURCH-THE CATHOLIC CHURCH !!


MY CHURCH IS THE CHURCH OF GOD, NOT CATHOLIC, PROTESTANT, PRESBYTARIAN, METHODIST, BAPTIST ETC... I AM THE CHURCH OF GOD AND THE HEAD OF THE CHURCH IS JESUS CHRIST !

COL 1:8, KJV

And he ( JESUS CHRIST) IS THE HEAD of the body, THE CHURCH: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.

JESUS CHRIST IS THE HEAD OF THE CHURCH, NOT CATHOLIC POPE , THOSE WHO CLAIM POPE IS THE ONE THEY AGAINST JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF ! OKAY !



🔥🔥🔥🔥MY WARNING TO CATHOLICS .

I think you-CATHOLICS need an education, seriously, about your own Harlot of a church. Jesus Christ, nor did Peter establish your so called church. Note: Christendom United And Merged With The Roman Empire. This Was The Real Beginning Of The Roman Catholic Church. m.l. 🔥🔥🔥🔥

It is regretable that many Catholics have been told that the Christian Church started with the Roman Catholic Church. The fact is that the Roman Catholic Church was not founded until AFTER the Council of Nicea in 325 A.D. The position of the Bishop of Rome did exist a bit before the Council of Nicea. But it was a very different position, before Constantine and After Constantine. It is routinely stated that Constantine was supposedly a convert to Christianity. But the facts do not support this - at least not until he was at death's door. According to what Eusebius, (the bishop of Constantine) he wrote that Constantine WANTED to become a Christian but Eusebius talked him out of it, suggesting that he delay until he was on his deathbed.

This is exactly what happened. For all of his life, Constantine was a worshipper of the Sun God Sol Invictus (better known as Mithras/Mitra). Catholics are often told that Constantine was converted by his vision of a cross. But a vision does not save anyone. Charles Manson had visions, did that save him ? The record of what Constantine saw when he supposedly saw his cross, was not a cross in anycase: The records very precisely describe what today is known as an "Egyptian Ankh", an egyptian symbol of paganism. At best, Constantine was a very confused person. The position of the Bishop of Rome was a voluntary and honorary position. It carried no force of law, and there was no ecclesiastical law.


It would take the backing of the Roman Emperor to turn the position of the Bishop of Rome into the Roman Catholic Papacy. With the backing of the Roman Emperors, the newly politicized Pope began to claim sole authority for himself. The records of history are clear that over and over, he was repeatedly rebuked for his claims. Were the other Christians around him suddenly acting in a rebelious manner ? Not at all. Even in the 300s, those early Christians were telling the Pope that a Christian's allegiance is to Jesus Christ, not to a political institutions like the Roman Catholic Hierarchy. This brings us to the question: If the Catholic Church did not exist until after it was set up by Constantine AFTER the Council of Nicea, then how did the world hear about Christianity BEFORE the creation of the Roman Catholic Church ? The answer is by the Disciples and Apostles that Jesus had originally sent out. It was not 12 Desciples "under Peter". It was the desciples and apostles, that worked together, and all of them were submissive to each other in accordance with Biblical principles. Those Disciples - like Paul - went all over the Roman Empire, preaching the gospel. The Roman Empire responded by persecuting them. The Christian Church was mostly an underground church for the fist 3 centuries. Where was the Pope at that point ? To be a leader of the Catholic Church was a position of wealth and prestige. But for the first 3 centuries, there was No Pope. There was however, a pagan equivalent to Pope in the paganized world of the Roman Emperor. This man was known as the Pontifex Maximus.This title was later taken by the Roman Catholic Popes.

Is there any evidence that Peter was ever Pope ? not the slightest. Is there any evidence that any of the disciples of Jesus ever recognized Peter as being the first Pope ? Not in the least. If the Apostles and Disciples of Jesus would have wanted to, they could have set themselves up as Kings and Popes. Instead they concentrated on the teachings of Jesus Christ as found in the Bible. One of the better indications of the Lack of Pope & Catholic Church is the record left to us by Polycarp, who was discipled by John. It is interesting that Polycarp is one of the few known disciples of those original disciples of Jesus. Polycarp could have made the case, either that Peter was the first Pope, or that He - Polycarp - should have been included in the line of succession. But that is not what happened. Polycarp omitted any mention of a Pope. The position had not even been invented. The only Church at the outset which existed was the true church of the true Christians. It predates the Roman Catholic Church by 300 years.


The lines of succession of the Pope and the Papacy for the first 325 Years of the Roman Catholic Church are entirely ficticious. They are made up. They are non-existent persons of non-history. As with the forged "Donation of Constantine", the Catholic Church HIerarchy is well known for simply inventing history when it is convenient to suit themselves. In addition, the lines of succession from Peter to Constantine have been replaced. At one time, certain people succeeded each other as "Pope". But in other Catholic Documents, the line of succession for the first 300 years is entirely different. Much of this is referenced in the book Vicars of Christ. Now that is just the tip of the iceberg...


More info here.
http://www.watchmanscry.com/forum/archive/index.php... You can learn more about your Satanic church, that is when you learn to have a great Love for The Truth, you just might actually learn something that isn't a lie.




 

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

THE GOSPEL BARNABAS AGAINST GOD'S WORD AND ATTACK CHRISTIANS , IT IS NOT THE GOSPEL, IT IS FAKE !

THE GOSPEL  BARNABAS AGAINST GOD'S WORD AND ATTACK CHRISTIANS , IT IS NOT THE GOSPEL,  IT IS FAKE  !


MANY MUSLIMS SUPPORTING THE GOSPEL BARNABAS TO DENY JESUS CHRIST IS THE MESSIAH, THE SON OF GOD AND CRUCIFIED AND DIED ON THE CROSS.

LET'S SEE IN FACT GOSPEL BARNABAS WAS WRITTEN IN MIDDLE AGE,  FAR AHEAD OR OVER A THOUSAND PLUS SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS  AFTER JESUS DIED ON THE CROSS , AND 700 YEARS AFTER MUHAMMAD AND THE WRITTER HAS NEVER  SEEN JESUS CHRIST , HIS DISCIPLES AND OTHER APOSTLES. THE WRITTER WAS NOT REAL BARNABAS THAT MENTIONED IN ACTS 11, BUT A MUSLIM WHO WROTE IT AND DESPERATE TO VALIDATE MUHAMMAD IS THE PROPHET THAT JESUS WAS TALKING ABOUT AND QURAN IS THE WORD OF GOD.

IF GOSPEL BARNABAS IS REAL WRITTEN BY BARNABAS IN THE BIBLE, HOW COME WAS WRITTEN OVER A THOUSAND PLUS SEVERAL HUNDRED YEARS LATER NOT THE TIME WHEN BARNABAS WAS STILL ALIVE THEN OR THE SAME TIME WITH APOSTLE PAUL WRITTINGS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT   ????


THE WRITINGS IN THE FAKE GOSPEL BARNABAS,  DO NOT MENTION OR NO PROOFS ABOUT THE HISTORY DURING THE FIRST CHURCHES LIKE IN ACTS 11 IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, BUT MORE LIKE THE WRITTINGS AND THE HISTORY IN THE MIDDLE AGES OR THE MIDDLE OF CENTURY !

THE FACT IS GOSPEL BARNABAS IS FAKE AND FORGERY ! IT IS NOT THE PART OF THE BIBLE AND NOT THE WORD OF GOD, PERIOD !

THE REAL-GENUINE BARNABAS WAS A FRIEND OF APOSTLE PAUL AND HE WAS ONE OF THE APOSTLES BUT NOT JESUS CHRIST DISCIPLES, ! HE'S MENTIONED IN ACTS 11 IN THE BIBLE.

MUSLIM CLAIM BARNABAS WAS A CLOSE DISCIPLE OF JESUS CHRIST, WELL THAT'S FAKE OR WRONG ! IN FACT JESUS CHRIST'S CLOSE DISCIPLE AND HIS BELOVED ONE WAS JOHN, THE SON OF ZEBEDEE  AND JAMES BROTHER.

http://www.gotquestions.org/disciple-whom-Jesus-loved.html

SO NOT WHOSOEVER TO CLAIM THE FAKE GOSPEL BARANABAS IS THE PART OF THE BIBLE. 

IN FACT BARNABAS WRITTINGS CONTRADICTED TO QURAN ITSELF, NOT JUST CONTRADICTED TO THE BIBLE.

MUSLIMS WHO BELIEVE THE BARNABAS WRITINGS TO ATTACK CHRISTIANS , AND AGAINST THE GOSPEL- THE BIBLE , JUST PLAIN STUPID IDIOT WHO DON'T KNOW WHAT IT'S TRULLY WRITTEN IN THEIR QURAN-THEIR FALSE BOOK ITSELF !

"
The Gospel of Barnabas also clearly contradicts the Qur'an about the birth of Jesus when it says:

The virgin was surrounded by a light exceeding bright and brought forth her son without pain. (The Gospel of Barnabas, p.5).
This is a clear repetition of Roman Catholic beliefs of the Middle Ages. The bright light and the painless birth find parallels in the beliefs about the Virgin Mary in the churches of Europe in Mediaeval times. No such details are found in the Biblical account of the birth of Jesus but the Qur'an directly contradicts the Gospel of Barnabas when it says:

And the pangs of childbirth drove her unto the trunk of the palm tree. Surah 19.23
Because the Gospel of Barnabas purports to be an account of the life of Jesus written by one of his disciples, and further because it has been clearly composed to synchronise with the Qur'an in its concept of Jesus as a prophet of Islam, the Muslim world has not hesitated to foist this book on the Christian world as the "true Gospel". But we are constrained to ask how this book can be true in Muslim eyes if it contradicts the Qur'an which the Muslims believe to be the Word of God.
In the Gospel of Barnabas we read that Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea both at the time of the birth of Jesus (p.4) and during the time of his ministry thirty years later. Palestine was a particularly difficult trouble-spot for the Romans and no governor was sent there for long - let alone thirty years. We know from history in any event that Pilate was only appointed governor in 27 AD - more than a generation after the birth of Jesus. This is another faux pas - one of many in the pages of this Gospel.
Another contradiction between the Gospel of Barnabas and the Qur'an is found in their respective accounts of the end times. According to the Gospel of Barnabas, on the thirteenth day of a fifteen day climax leading to the end of all things, "the heaven shall be rolled up like a book, and it shall rain fire, so that every living thing shall die" (p.70). The Qur'an, however, says of the Last Day:

But when the shout cometh on the day when a man fleeth from his brother and his mother and his father and his wife and his children, every man will have that day concern enough to make him heedless of others. Surah 80.33-37
There is a clear contradiction here. The Gospel of Barnabas states that two days before the end all shall perish but the Qur'an states that men will still be alive until the last day when the trumpet shall sound from heaven. The Muslim world must choose between the Qur'an and the Gospel of Barnabas - no man can sincerely believe that the latter book is a true account of the life of Jesus Christ if he still believes that the Qur'an is the Word of God."

http://www.bible.ca/islam/library/Gilchrist/barnabas.htm 



Question:
What’s this about a Gospel of Barnabas? Who wrote it and why? Was
Barnabas an apostle or not?

Answer:
The New Testament speaks of a 1st Century Jew named Joseph, a Levitical
priest from the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, who became a follower of
Jesus. He “was a good man, and full of the Holy Spirit and of faith (Acts
11:24) and was nicknamed Barnabas (“son of encouragement”) by his fellow
Christians (Acts 4:36-37). The church in Jerusalem sent Barnabas to
Antioch to investigate the stories of Gentiles becoming Christians (Acts
11:19-30), and later the Holy Spirit would send Barnabas and the apostle
Paul out from Antioch on a missionary journey (Acts 13:1-3). This might
be why Barnabas seems to be called an apostle in Acts 14:14 (the word
apostle means “sent one,” from the Greek apostolos).

Over the centuries, many legends arose concerning Jesus and his apostles
and early disciples, and often their names would be attached to spurious
Christian documents. Barnabas was no exception. There was a letter
called The Epistle of Barnabas that might have been written in 2nd Century
Alexandria, but there is no known connection to the actual Barnabas in the
1st Century. A 4th Century copy of The Epistle of Barnabas was found in
1859.

Cyprus would become known as the island of St. Barnabas, and a tale of his
adventures called The Acts of Barnabas was probably written there in the
5th Century. Once again, there is no historical connection between the
real Barnabas? life in the 1st Century and these stories being written
about him hundreds of years later.

Although a false gospel called the Gospel of Barnabas is mentioned on a
late 5th Century list of forbidden books, no ancient manuscript has ever
been found. The Gospel of Barnabas we have today is based on Spanish and
Italian manuscripts that most likely date to 14th Century Spain, not the
1st Century. Some scholars believe that this gospel was forged by Muslims
(the Moors) to bridge the theological gaps between the Bible and the
Koran.

After surveying the current scholarship on The Gospel of Barnabas, former
missionary Jan Slomp concluded, “The so-called Gospel of Barnabas?is a
forgery by all definitions.”

Muslim scholar Cyril Glasse writes in the The Concise Encyclopedia of
Islam that “As regards the “Gospel of Barnabas” itself, there is no
question that it is a medieval forgery … It contains anachronisms which
can date only from the Middle Ages and not before, and shows a garbled
comprehension of Islamic doctrines, calling the Prophet the “Messiah”,
which Islam does not claim for him. Besides it farcical notion of sacred
history, stylistically it is a mediocre parody of the Gospels, as the
writings of Baha Allah are of the Koran.”

Researcher Samuel Green concludes: “The Gospel of Barnabas is not an
authentic Gospel of Jesus. The author does not understand the language,
history or geography of the 1st century A.D., and there is no ancient
evidence for the book. The internal evidence of the book suggests it was
written in the 14th century and there are Muslim scholars who agree with
this dating. The book is a rewrite of the Biblical Gospel most likely by a
Muslim who wanted to show that Jesus taught Islam and predicted the coming
of Muhammad. This type of rewriting has been done elsewhere by Muslims in
the Gospel According to Islam. This type of behaviour is disgraceful, and
it is disgraceful for Muslims to continue to publish, promote and
distribute this false Scripture.”

Regardless of who wrote The Gospel of Barnabas and why, there is no reason
to believe that it traces back to the real Barnabas.

Barnabas was a remarkable man of God, but the only accurate record we have
of him is Luke?s Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament, not The
Epistle of Barnabas or The Acts of Barnabas. Jesus is more than
remarkable, but the most accurate historical records we have of Him are
the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, not The Gospel of Barnabas.

Dan Conder

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

MUSLIMS FRIEND IS JINN AND CHRISTIANS FRIEND IS THE HOLY SPIRIT.

MUSLIMS FRIEND IS JINN AND CHRISTIANS FRIEND IS THE HOLY SPIRIT.

When I was looking for the translation tuyul in Indonesian to English thru bing translator, it says toyol in English , whaaat are you serious ??? toyol hahaha.

The reason I'm looking for this I'd like to tell you :
Muslims friends are jinn and tuyul/ toyol. (the demons-evil spirits) ****tuyul is simlar like drude , lol
Christians friend is the Holy Spirit (the spirit of God)..

Which one you like ? your friends are jinn and toyol or the Holy Spirit. ?
SO THOSE WHO HAVE THE CLEAR MIND AND OPEN EYES KNOW WHICH ONE IS TRUE OR NOT... WHICH ONE IS FROM SATAN OR NOT.

JINN IN THE QURAN :
http://quran.com/72 


IN ISLAM SAYS DO NOT BELIEVE JINN MUSLIMS WILL ENTER HELL, REALLY ?

SOME PEOPLE WORSHIP THE JINN


They will say, 'Glory be to You! You are our Protector, not them. No, they were worshipping the jinn. They mostly had faith in them.' (Surah Saba, 41)

JINN'S WHISPERING INTO HEART

… from the evil of the insidious whisperer who whispers in people's breasts and comes from the jinn and from mankind.' (Surat an-Nas, 4-6)

THE JINN ARE ENEMIES OF THE PROPHET

In this way We have appointed as enemies to every Prophet satans from both mankind and from the jinn, who inspire each other with delusions by means of specious words - if your Lord had willed, they would not have done it, so abandon them and all they fabricate. (Surat al-Anam, 112)

THEY BECOME INTIMATE COMPANIONS TO THEIR FOLLOWERS

We have assigned close comrades to them who have made what is before them and behind them seem good to them. And the statement about the nations, both of jinn and men, who passed away before them has proved true of them as well. Certainly they were lost. (Surah Fussilat, 25)

jInn on the day of rIsIng

When heaven is split apart and goes red like dregs of oil. So which of your Lord's blessings do you both then deny? That Day no man or jinn will be asked about his sin. (Surat ar-Rahman, 37-39)

DISBELIEVING JINN WILL ENTER HELL

'Had We so willed We could have given guidance to everyone, but now My Words are shown to be true: that I shall fill up Hell entirely with jinn and human beings. (Surat as-Sajda, 13)

We created many of the jinn and mankind for Hell. They have hearts they do not understand with. They have eyes they do not see with. They have ears they do not hear with. Such people are like cattle. No, they are even worse! They are the unaware. (Surat al-A'raf, 179)

He will say, 'Enter the Fire together with the nations of jinn and men who have passed away before you.' Each time a nation enters, it will curse its sister nation, until, when they are all gathered together in it, the last of them will say to the first, 'Our Lord, those are the ones who misguided us, so give them a double punishment in the Fire.' He will say, 'Each will receive double. But you do not know it.' (Surat al-A'raf, 38)


http://www.islamawareness.net/Jinn/hyjinn.html 


MUSLIMS MAKE JESUS AS THEIR PROPHET BUT THEY MOCK AND DISLIKE HIM .

MUSLIMS MAKE JESUS AS THEIR PROPHET BUT THEY MOCK AND DISLIKE HIM .

MUSLIMS RIDICULE, MAKE FUN AND MOCK JESUS CHRIST, BUT THEY MAKE JESUS AS THEIR PROPHET, EVEN BETTER THAN MUHAMMAD AND CLAIM JESUS CHRIST IS IN HEAVEN, BUT MUHAMMAD IS NOT, ACCORDING TO THEIR QURAN.

WHAT KIND OF IDIOT PEOPLE BELIEVE SUCH A THING, DON'T LIKE JESUS CHRIST EVEN HATE HIM BUT MAKE HIM AS THEIR PROPHET, LOL

90 PERCENT MUSLIMS DON'T READ QURAN EVEN NEVER READ IT, ESPECIALLY THE ONES WHO DON'T SPEAK ARAB, THAT'S THE IDEA FROM SATAN, MISLEAD PEOPLE EVEN MORE.. WHAT KIND OF GOD-ALLAH ONLY UNDERSTAND ARAB, MUSLIMS MUST PRAY IN ARAB, STUPID-IDIOT GOD TOO.

ACCORDING TO HADITH MUHAMMAD IS NOT IN HEAVEN, NOT UNTIL THE DAY OF JUDGMENT, BUT JESUS IS ALREADY IN HEAVEN, REALLY ??
Let us analyze this Hadith and see what does it say?
This Hadith says that Mohammed is not in heaven right now but he is waiting for the 'Day of Judgment' to go into heaven and he will be the first to cross the bridge to go to heaven as we read this, "Then Allah will come to them again and say, 'I am your Lord.' They will say, 'You are our Lord.' Allah will call them, and As-Sirat (a bridge) will be laid across Hell and I (Muhammad) shall be the first amongst the Apostles to cross it with my followers. Nobody except the Apostles will then be able to speak and they will be saying then, 'O Allah! Save us. O Allah Save us.' "
Hadith Volume 1, Book 8, Number 345 also says that while Mohammed was in this world he ascended into heaven and saw many prophets and other Bible characters like Adam, Moses, Jesus and Abraham. (**MUHAMMAD SAW JESUS, ADAM , MOSES AND ABRAHAM ARE IN HEAVEN) And he saw the paradise while he was still alive and on this earth but why he should wait to go to heaven after his death? I asked many Muslims where Mohammed is right now and WHY HE (MUHAMMAD) IS WAITING FOR THE DAY OF JUDGMENT ? Why he could not reach heaven while he saw many ancient prophets and the first human of this planet earth - Adam who lived many thousands of years before Mohammed. All are in heaven but Mohammed says, he will reach heaven on the Day of Judgment, why? But no Muslim could reply these questions. 

 *** David was saved when he was in this world itself. Isaiah got the forgiveness of his sins while he was in this world itself. So Bible makes it clear that we have to get saved in this world itself and that after death there is no hope to know God or to get salvation.

The same Hadith that I quoted above says this, "He will order the angels to take out of Hell those who worshipped none but Him alone. The angels will take them out by recognizing them from the traces of prostrations, for Allah has forbidden the (Hell) fire to eat away those traces. So they will come out of the Fire, it will eat away the whole of the human body except the marks of the prostrations. At that time they will come out of the Fire as mere skeletons. The Water of Life will be poured on them and as a result they will grow like the seeds growing on the bank of flowing water....."

This Hadith clearly says that the followers of Allah are going straight to hell fire as this Hadith says that Allah will order the angels to take out of Hell those who worshipped none but Allah alone. And angels will recognize them by the marks of prostrations.

But how sad it is that Muslims are waiting to go to this horrible place. How sad it is that they are following a god who promised hell fire for them. How sad it is that they put all their trust and belief on Allah with all their heart and with all their passion just to go to Hell fire!


MORE TO READ :

http://bibleandquran.com/hell.htm 


Muslim said Hadith Al-Qudsi: These too are the verbatim Words of Allah but they are not part of the Qur'an; however they too fall under the category of Revelation. So Hadith IS VALID THE WORD OF ALLAH.

http://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/7603/does-the-quran-contain-all-of-allahs-revelations-sunni-view 


[[JESUS VS MUHAMMAD]]

1 Peter 2:21-22 To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps. “He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.”


Quran 33:21 There has certainly been for you in the Messenger of Allah (muhammad) an excellent pattern for anyone whose hope is in Allah and the Last Day and [who] remembers Allah often.

●Muhammad said Allah doesnt love unbelievers. (Qur'an 3:32, 22:38) 

■Jesus said God loves everyone. (John 3:16) 
●Muhammad "I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah" (Muslim 1:33) (Bukhari 2:24) 
■Jesus "He who lives by the sword will die by the sword." (Matthew 26:52) 
●Muhammad Stoned women for adultery. (Muslim 4206) 
■Jesus "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." (John 8:7) 
●Muhammad Permitted stealing from unbelievers. (Bukhari 44:668, Ibn Ishaq 764) 
■Jesus "Thou shalt not steal." (Matthew 19:18) 
●Muhammad Permitted lying. (Sahih Muslim 6303, Bukhari 49:857) 
■Jesus "Thou shalt not bear false witness." (Matthew 19:18) 
●Muhammad Owned and traded slaves. (Sahih Muslim 3901) 
■Jesus Neither owned nor traded slaves. 
●Muhammad Beheaded 800-900 Jewish men and boys. (Sahih Muslim 4390) 
■Jesus Beheaded no one. 
●Muhammad Murdered those who insulted him. (Bukhari 56:369, 4:241) 
■Jesus Preached forgiveness. (Matthew 18:21-22, 5:38) 
●Muhammad "If then anyone transgresses the prohibition against you, Transgress ye likewise against him" (Qur'an 2:194) 
■Jesus "If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also." (Matthew 5:39) 
●Muhammad Jihad in the way of Allah elevates one's position in Paradise by a hundred fold. (Muslim 4645) 
■Jesus "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called Sons of God" (Matthew 5:9) 
●Muhammad Married 13 wives and kept sex slaves. (Bukhari 5:268, Qur'an 33:50) 
■Jesus Was celibate. 
●Muhammad Slept with a 9-year-old child. (Sahih Muslim 3309, Bukhari 58:236) 
■Jesus Did not have sex with children. 
●Muhammad Ordered the murder of women. (Ibn Ishaq 819, 995) 
■Jesus Never harmed a woman. 
●Muhammad "O you who believe! Fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness." (Qur'an 9:123) 
■Jesus "Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth." (Matthew 5:5) 
●Muhammad Ordered 65 military campaigns and raids in his last 10 years. (Ibn Ishaq ) 
■Jesus Ordered no military campaigns, nor offered any approval of war or violence. 
●Muhammad Killed captives taken in battle. (Ibn Ishaq 451) 
■Jesus Never took captives. Never killed anyone. 
●Muhammad Encouraged his men to rape enslaved women. (Abu Dawood 2150, Qur'an 4:24) 
■Jesus Never encouraged rape. Never enslaved women. 
●Muhammad Demanded captured slaves and a fifth of all other loot taken in war. (Qur'an 8:41) 
■Jesus "The Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve." (Matthew 20:28) 
●Muhammad Was never tortured, but tortured others. (Muslim 4131, Ibn Ishaq 436, 595, 734, 764) 
■Jesus Suffered torture, but never tortured anyone. 
●Muhammad "And fight them until there is no more persecution and religion is only for Allah" (Qur'an 8:39) 
■Jesus "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you" (Matthew 5:44) 
●Muhammad His revelations were from an "angel" (satan) and thought his revelations were demonic. (Ibn Ishaq, p. 106, Sahih Bukhari 1:3, Sahih Bukhari 24 5279, 54 438) 
■Jesus His revelations were directly from The Father, and claimed to be God. (John 8:28, John 10:30, John 8:58) 
●Muhammad Didnt know what was going to happen with him. (Quran 46:9, Sahih Bukhari 58 266, Sahih Bukhari 51 16) ■Jesus Claimed to be the way the truth and the life. (John 14:6) 
●Muhammad Was bewitched (Sahih Bukhari 71 660, 53 400) 
■Jesus Wasnt 
●Muhammad Died like a false prophet (Quran 69:44-46, Sahih Bukhari 59 713) 
■Jesus Came to die for the sins of the world and resurrected. (Mark 10:45, John 10:18, Romans 8:11) 
●Muhammad Cursed jews and christians before dying (Sahih Bukhari 2.23.472, Sahih Muslim 1082) 
■Jesus before dying: Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing." (Luke 23:34) *Matthew 7:15-20 《Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thornbushes nor figs from thistles, are they? “So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. “A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. “Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. “So then, you will know them by their fruits.》